Full Professorship Appointment Procedure

The appointment procedure at the Faculty of Arts follows the successful completion of the habilitation procedure and further academic practice. An applicant for the title of “Professor” proves that they are a prominent and internationally respected scientific personality in their field in all areas of academic activity. The appointment procedure includes a public lecture before the Research Board of the Faculty of Arts, Charles University, as well as the procedure before the Research Board of Charles University. If the proposal receives a majority of votes from all members of the Research Board of Charles University, the procedure is referred to the Minister of Education, Youth and Sports for a decision.

Detailed information for applicants, the Chair of the Subject-Area Board and the Evaluation Commission can be found in the individual sections below.


List of accredited fields for procedures to attain associate professorship and procedures for the appointment of full professorship at the Faculty of Arts, Charles University is available here.

The procedure for appointment as professor and the habilitation procedure at the Faculty of Arts, Charles University (FF UK) are governed by the following regulations:

  1. Submission of the Application
    • The candidate submits a complete application with all required appendices.
    • The procedure is officially initiated on the date of submission to the Department of Research (hereafter “OV”), Faculty of Arts, Charles University.
  2. Establishment of the Full Professorship Commission
    • The Subject-Area Board of the relevant doctoral program proposes a commission for the appointment procedure.
    • The application is reviewed by the Dean’s Board and then approved by the Research Board of the Faculty, along with the proposed inaugural lectures.
  3. Fee Payment and Document Updates
    • The candidate is required to pay a fee of 5,000 CZK.
    • The candidate submits the theses of the selected lecture.
    • The candidate updates any necessary appendices of the application.
  4. Evaluation by the Commission
    • The commission assesses the candidate’s scientific and pedagogical qualifications.
    • An evaluation opinion is issued, including recommendations on the further progress of the procedure.
    • The candidate receives this opinion for review immediately, but no later than 14 days before their presentation at the Research Board of the Faculty.
  5. Presentation before the Research Board of the Faculty
    • The candidate presents their inaugural lecture and comments on the commission’s opinion.
    • The Research Board votes in a closed session on whether to recommend or not recommend the candidate.
    • If the candidate is not recommended, the procedure is terminated.
  6. Forwarding the Case to the Rector’s Office
    • If recommended, the case file is forwarded to the Rectorate of Charles University for further proceedings.
  7. Decision by University Authorities
    • The Rector’s Board and the Research Board of Charles University review the case.
    • The candidate presents a brief statement regarding the prospects of their field before the university’s Research Board.
  8. Presidential Appointment
    • If approved by the Research Board of Charles University, the case is submitted to the President of the Czech Republic through the Minister of Education for a final decision.
  9. Timeline for Completion
    • The entire procedure should be completed within twelve months from the date of application submission (or from the date of any required amendments requested by the Dean).

Conditions for Initiating the Procedure

Recommended criteria are detailed in Dean’s Directive No. 5/2025. For procedures initiated before May 15, 2025, Rector’s Directive No. 35/2019 also applies. A careful review of all relevant regulations is strongly recommended (see the Rules and Regulations section).

Eligibility Criteria

To initiate the professorial appointment process, the candidate must meet the following requirements:

  • Previous appointment as a docent (associate professor) based on a habilitation dissertation defence. For more information on the recognition of foreign education (the so-called nostrification process), please visit the rectorate’s website.
  • At least five years of cumulative pedagogical experience at a university.
  • Supervision of PhD students, with at least one student having successfully completed their doctorate. A consultant who demonstrably participates in the preparation of the doctoral student throughout the study may also be considered a supervisor.
  • Minimum of 40 academic publications.
  • Minimum of 15 international or foreign-language publications.
  • Minimum of 50 citations in scientific literature (out of which 25 citations appear in international scientific literature). For more information on possible exceptions to the minimal counts, please see Article 3 (4) in Dean’s Directive No. 5/2025.
  • Two recommendation letters from professors in the same or a related field.

Proposal Submission

The candidate submits the application and its appendices, which form the core documents for the appointment process. Based on these documents, the Commission forms its opinion. The documents are also available to the Research Board of the Faculty.

  • The application is evaluated by the commission and made available to the Scientific Council of the Faculty.
  • The application must be submitted to the Research Department in both print and electronic form (appendices in .docx format are preferred).
  • Documents may be updated during the process, especially in cases of academic or calendar year changes or formal deficiencies.
  • Please note that the candidate must sign the application, confirming the accuracy and truthfulness of the provided information.

Required Documents

The application must include the following mandatory appendices (all obligatory forms can be downloaded in the section below):

  • Application for Initiating the Appointment Process (List of accredited fields for procedures to attain associate professorship and procedures for the appointment of full professorship at the Faculty of Arts, Charles University, available here).
  • Appendix 1: Curriculum Vitae.
  • Appendix 2: Diplomas. Certified copies of all degrees listed in the CV, including a PhD and docent degree. Foreign degrees must include their exact title and placement before or after the name. Please note that the condition of submitting a diploma also applies to graduates of the Faculty of Arts, Charles University. For more information on the recognition of foreign education (the so-called nostrification process), please visit the rectorate’s website.
  • Appendix 3: Verification of professional experience. Certificates from all workplaces where the candidate is currently employed. The Research Department provides verification for employment at Charles University.
  • Appendix 4: Evaluation of Professional and Scientific-Pedagogical Activities signed by the candidate’s supervisor (typically a department head or institute director) from all applicant’s workplaces. The format is flexible.
  • Appendix 5: Pedagogical Activity. It is reported for the current academic year and the five preceding years. It is documented using form 5a.
  • Appendix 6: Publishing Activity. Only published scientific, professional, or artistic works can be reported. In the case of collective publications, the applicant will indicate their authorship share (in percentage).
  • Appendix 7: Citation Counts. Multiple citations from the same source count only once. Self-citations and citations from student theses are excluded.
  • Appendix 8: Placements. If none, a statutory declaration confirming this must be provided.
  • Appendix 9: Grants.
  • Appendix 10: Conferences.
  • Appendix 11: Proposal for three inaugural lectures. After the Research Board selects one of the proposed topics, the candidate will be asked to submit detailed theses of the chosen lecture.
  • Appendix 12: Recommendation Letters and the Accompanying Sheet.
    • The proposal must be accompanied by a written recommendation from at least two professors of the same or related field.
    • The recommendation letters should not be older than 3 months and must be submitted in original form with the date of issue and signature.
    • If the recommendation letters are in a language other than Czech, Slovak, English, or German, the applicant is required to provide a translation of the letter into Czech.

Composition of the Commission

The appointment commission consists of five members, including professors, associate professors, and other distinguished representatives of the applicant’s field or a closely related discipline.

  • The chair of the commission must be a professor.
  • The formal requirements for the commission are specified in the Code of Procedure for the Granting of Associate Professorship and Full Professorship of Charles University and Rector’s Directive 55/2023.
  • For procedures initiated after May 1, 2025, the commission composition must also comply with the conditions set out in Dean’s Directive No. 5/2025.
  • The proposal for the commission must include short biographies of the nominated members (in a free format).

Valid rules for commission composition
Commission proposal form

Responsibilities of the Commission

The commission’s primary task is to evaluate the applicant’s qualifications and issue a written opinion concluding whether it recommends the applicant’s appointment as a professor to the Faculty Research Board or not. The opinion is based on the application and appendices, considering the criteria outlined in Rector’s Directive No. 6/2025 (for procedures initiated after May 15, 2025).

  • For proceedings initiated before May 15, 2025, it also takes into account Rector’s Directive No. 35/2019.
  • All documents are submitted through the CHRES application, which provides commission members with access to the relevant materials.
  • The commission’s opinion can also be completed within this application.

Commission’s Participation in the Faculty Research Board Meeting

The appointment commission is invited to the session of the Faculty Research Board, where the applicant’s defence takes place.

The chair of the commission (or a designated member) must:

  • Introduce the applicant to the council.
  • Summarize the recommendation letters from professors.
  • Present the commission’s final opinion.

Honorarium

The commission chair, if external to the Faculty of Arts, Charles University, is eligible for financial compensation, granted upon approval of the commission’s statement.

Commission Meetings

The commission chair arranges meeting dates and presides over the sessions. If the chair is unable to attend, a designated member (or, if necessary, the senior-most commission member) takes over. Meetings can be conducted both in person and online.

The commission has a quorum if at least four members are present. Voting on the commission’s opinion may take place:

  • In person during a meeting.
  • Remotely via the CHRES application.
  1. Introduction
    • The Dean or Vice-Dean introduces the agenda, the applicant, the commission chair, and the present commission members.
  2. Appointment Lecture (up to 30 minutes)
    • The applicant delivers their appointment lecture.
    • A presentation is mandatory.
  3. Summary of the Commission’s Opinion
    • The commission chair presents a summary of the commission’s opinion (reading the full statement is unnecessary, as it was made available to the members of the Research Board in advance).
    • The chair also summarizes the content of the recommendation letters.
  4. Applicant’s Response
    • The applicant comments on the recommendation letters and the commission’s statement.
    • The applicant also provides a brief reflection (5–10 minutes) on their pedagogical and research activities as well as their future academic plans.
  5. Open Discussion
    • A public discussion, which may focus on the appointment lecture, and the applicant’s academic portfolio, follows.
    • The applicant answers each question immediately after it is posed.
  6. Closed Session
    • Guests and the applicant leave the room. The commission generally remains present.
    • A three-member evaluation subcommittee of the Research Board assesses the applicant’s lecture:
      • A designated representative reads the proposed evaluation text.
      • Potential discussion on the evaluation of the lecture.
      • Vote on the final text of the evaluation.
    • If necessary, the entire appointment process is further discussed.
  7. Voting (Secret ballot)
    • After the discussion concludes, a secret vote takes place.
    • Voting requirements:
      • A quorum of 29 members is needed (out of 43 total members of the Research Board).
      • A simple majority (at least 22 positive votes) is required for a recommendation.
  8. Announcement of the Results
    • The results are announced in the presence of the applicant and the public.
    • The applicant may respond to the outcome.

General information on the website of the Rectorate of Charles University here.

Specific procedure for the candidate’s presentation before the Research Board of Charles University here.

Contacts

Research Office

nám. Jana Palacha 1/2
116 38 Prague 1


Responsible person:

Mgr. Roman Zaťko, Ph.D.
Contact: roman.zatko@ff.cuni.cz


Important links

Research Office website
Research Board of Charles University
Academic-Pedagogical Degrees